7 things about marijuanna
09.27.05 (8:47 pm) [edit]
1 Q. Is Marijuana Addictive?
A. No, it is not Most users are moderate consumers who smoke it socially to relax. We now know that 10% of our population have "addictive personalities" and they are neither more nor less likely to overindulge in cannabis than in anything else. On a relative scale, marijuana is less habit forming than either sugar or chocolate but more so than anchovies. Sociologists report a general pattern of marijuana use that peaks in the early adult years, followed by a period of levelling off and then a gradual reduction in use
1 Q. Has Anyone Ever Died From Smoking Marijuana?
A. No; not one single case, not ever. THC is one of the few chemicals for which there is no known toxic amount [10]. The federal agency NIDA says that autopsies reveal that 75 people per year are high on marijuana when they die: this does not mean that marijuana caused or was even a factor in their deaths. The chart below compares the number of deaths attributable to selected substances in a typical year:
Tobacco...340,000 - 395,000
Alcohol (excluding crime/accidents)...125,000+
Drug Overdose (prescription)...24,000 - 27,000
Drug Overdose (illegal)...3,800 - 5,200
Marijuana... ...0
*Source: U.S. Government Bureau of Mortality Statistics, 1987
3 Q. Does Marijuana Lead to Crime and/or Hard Drugs?
A. No [11]. The only crime most marijuana users commit is that they use marijuana. And, while many people who abuse dangerous drugs also smoke marijuana, the old "stepping stone" theory is now discredited, since virtually all of them started out "using" legal drugs like sugar, coffee, cigarettes, alcohol, etc.
4 Q. Does Marijuana Make People Violent?
A. No. In fact, Federal Bureau of Narcotics director Harry Anslinger once told Congress just the opposite - that it leads to non-violence and pacifism [12]. If he was telling the truth (which he and key federal agencies have not often done regarding marijuana), then re-legalizing marijuana should be considered as one way to curb violence in our cities. The simple fact is that marijuana does not change your basic personality. The government says that over 20 million Americans still smoke it, probably including some of the nicest people you know.
5 Q. How Does Marijuana Affect Your Health?
A. Smoking anything is not healthy, but marijuana is less dangerous than tobacco and people smoke less of it at a time. This health risk can be avoided by eating the plant instead of smoking it [13], or can be reduced by smoking smaller amounts of stronger marijuana. There is no proof that marijuana causes serious health or sexual problems [14] but, like alcohol, its use by children or adolescents is discouraged. Cannabis is a medicinal herb that has hundreds of proven, valuable theraputic uses - from stress reduction to glaucoma to asthma to cancer therapy, etc. [15].
6 Q. What About All Those Scary Statistics and Studies?
A. Most were prepared as scare tactics for the government by Dr. Gabriel Nahas, and were so biased and unscientific that Nahas was fired by the National Institute of Health [16] and finally renounced his own studies as meaningless [17]. For one experiment, he suffocated monkeys for five minutes at a time, using proportionately more smoke than the average user inhales in an entire lifetime [18]. The other studies that claim sensational health risks are also suspect, since they lack controls and produce results which cannot be replicated or independently verified [19].
7 Q. What Can I Do About Marijuana?
A. No independent government panel that has studied marijuana has ever recommended jail for users [20]. Concerned persons should therefore ask their legislators to re-legalize and tax this plant, subject to age limits and regulations similar to those on alcohol and tobacco.
A. No, it is not Most users are moderate consumers who smoke it socially to relax. We now know that 10% of our population have "addictive personalities" and they are neither more nor less likely to overindulge in cannabis than in anything else. On a relative scale, marijuana is less habit forming than either sugar or chocolate but more so than anchovies. Sociologists report a general pattern of marijuana use that peaks in the early adult years, followed by a period of levelling off and then a gradual reduction in use
1 Q. Has Anyone Ever Died From Smoking Marijuana?
A. No; not one single case, not ever. THC is one of the few chemicals for which there is no known toxic amount [10]. The federal agency NIDA says that autopsies reveal that 75 people per year are high on marijuana when they die: this does not mean that marijuana caused or was even a factor in their deaths. The chart below compares the number of deaths attributable to selected substances in a typical year:
Tobacco...340,000 - 395,000
Alcohol (excluding crime/accidents)...125,000+
Drug Overdose (prescription)...24,000 - 27,000
Drug Overdose (illegal)...3,800 - 5,200
Marijuana... ...0
*Source: U.S. Government Bureau of Mortality Statistics, 1987
3 Q. Does Marijuana Lead to Crime and/or Hard Drugs?
A. No [11]. The only crime most marijuana users commit is that they use marijuana. And, while many people who abuse dangerous drugs also smoke marijuana, the old "stepping stone" theory is now discredited, since virtually all of them started out "using" legal drugs like sugar, coffee, cigarettes, alcohol, etc.
4 Q. Does Marijuana Make People Violent?
A. No. In fact, Federal Bureau of Narcotics director Harry Anslinger once told Congress just the opposite - that it leads to non-violence and pacifism [12]. If he was telling the truth (which he and key federal agencies have not often done regarding marijuana), then re-legalizing marijuana should be considered as one way to curb violence in our cities. The simple fact is that marijuana does not change your basic personality. The government says that over 20 million Americans still smoke it, probably including some of the nicest people you know.
5 Q. How Does Marijuana Affect Your Health?
A. Smoking anything is not healthy, but marijuana is less dangerous than tobacco and people smoke less of it at a time. This health risk can be avoided by eating the plant instead of smoking it [13], or can be reduced by smoking smaller amounts of stronger marijuana. There is no proof that marijuana causes serious health or sexual problems [14] but, like alcohol, its use by children or adolescents is discouraged. Cannabis is a medicinal herb that has hundreds of proven, valuable theraputic uses - from stress reduction to glaucoma to asthma to cancer therapy, etc. [15].
6 Q. What About All Those Scary Statistics and Studies?
A. Most were prepared as scare tactics for the government by Dr. Gabriel Nahas, and were so biased and unscientific that Nahas was fired by the National Institute of Health [16] and finally renounced his own studies as meaningless [17]. For one experiment, he suffocated monkeys for five minutes at a time, using proportionately more smoke than the average user inhales in an entire lifetime [18]. The other studies that claim sensational health risks are also suspect, since they lack controls and produce results which cannot be replicated or independently verified [19].
7 Q. What Can I Do About Marijuana?
A. No independent government panel that has studied marijuana has ever recommended jail for users [20]. Concerned persons should therefore ask their legislators to re-legalize and tax this plant, subject to age limits and regulations similar to those on alcohol and tobacco.
posted by: KMK (reply)
post date: 09.29.05 (8:43 am)
Don't steal shit from the Hempfiles motherfucker.
posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 09.30.05 (3:52 am)
I say legalize it.
I don't smoke marijuana. But then again, I don't smoke or consume alcoholic beverages or play the lottery. I abstain from these for because of personal moral choices. And I think it would be wise for others to do the same. But, I should not force my morality upon others through the heavy hand of the law. So I say, legalize marijuana, and therefore maybe there will be some kind of control on its distribution and some kind of tax benefit from its sale.
Bet I'll get into trouble with this one!
By the way, what is KMK talking about?
posted by: passionsoul (reply)
post date: 09.30.05 (4:35 pm)
I don't smoke or drink,but marijuana is a natural herb,and a very pretty plant I think. I don't judge anyone that does smoke it and there is medical reasons why some smoke it,so I feel to each his own.
posted by: misdemeanors (reply)
post date: 09.30.05 (8:41 pm)
LoL...it isn't addictive???Cool!
posted by: Kupov (reply)
post date: 09.30.05 (8:43 pm)
Reply to: misdemeanors
Not at all
posted by: Kupov (reply)
post date: 09.30.05 (8:43 pm)
I also forgot to mention that to overdose on marijuanna you have to smoke two times your own body weight.
posted by: CrazyBeautiful3 (reply)
post date: 10.01.05 (12:36 pm)
good questions. and i like the new look too.
posted by: Boomersangel (reply)
post date: 10.02.05 (1:02 pm)
cool dude!! finally a post with some real merit!! Naw only kidding! I like the new topic....very cool...Blunts rule!
posted by: Kupov (reply)
post date: 10.02.05 (3:51 pm)
Reply to: Boomersangel
New topic yes i was running out of religious posts but have no fear my next shall be about how christianity oppresses women.
posted by: CrazyBeautiful3 (reply)
post date: 10.02.05 (3:52 pm)
yeah again good quetions. it is bad for you, the only thing it's good for is cancer. but tha should be watched. smoking the stuff is just stupid, but i wont lie i have done it before and it was stupid.
posted by: Kupov (reply)
post date: 10.02.05 (4:12 pm)
Reply to: CrazyBeautiful3
smoking anything is stupid but would you react harshly towards yourself because of alcohol? no given the choice i would rather my underage child smoked weed then got drunk.
posted by: sweetsue (reply)
post date: 10.02.05 (4:13 pm)
this is a better topic kupov..wtg! love the look of your blog.
I never hear of ppl killed others in accidents from marijuana..they can't say that about drinking...good post
posted by: Kupov (reply)
post date: 10.02.05 (4:15 pm)
Reply to: sweetsue
Thank you, actually here in canada last year they had a series of propoganda commercials about car accidents caused by marijuanna, they were taken down because of the pure simple fact that there has been no recorded death caused by marijuanna.
posted by: bacardibreezer (reply)
post date: 10.03.05 (4:35 pm)
Good post...I read this sort of stuff a while ago and I think people need to know it's not what the gov't and school tell you but I am not saying go out and do it.
posted by: LynnKramer (reply)
post date: 10.06.05 (1:09 pm)
Guns? Absence of religion? Lack of self esteem? Poor parenting? The entertainment industry? Who's to blame for Prof. Kupov's hostile endeavors? Numerous professionals (and not-so-professionals) have speculated and mulled, publicly and privately, over what has caused Prof. Kupov to promote a culture of dependency and failure. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in, I'll announce something to the effect of how we should not concern ourselves with Prof. Kupov's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that if Prof. Kupov can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Rotten Rhetoric. In the meantime, we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Prof. Kupov does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why without checks and balances, cranky bullies are free to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to improve the physical and spiritual quality of life for the population at present and for those yet to come. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, Prof. Kupov is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul.
Some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that my prime directive is to spread the word about Prof. Kupov's nugatory modes of thought to our friends, our neighbors, our relatives, our co-workers -- even to strangers. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. Prof. Kupov's protests have reached a depth of degeneracy that was virtually unknown in the past. From this anecdotal evidence, I would argue that he demands obeisance from his coadjutors. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Prof. Kupov forces them to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. Why he would even pretend that we should derive moral guidance from his glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented zingers is beyond me. Prof. Kupov's commitment to unilateralism is only part of the story. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Prof. Kupov's subliminal psywar campaigns are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant vandalism. Let's remember that. Prof. Kupov drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that to say that Prof. Kupov's homilies are Right with a capital R is naive nonsense and untrue to boot. Is this anything other than pestilential communism? The answer is obvious if you happen to notice that if I have a bias, it is only against avaricious devotees of conspiracy theories who start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people.
I don't see how Prof. Kupov can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that Prof. Kupov is proposing a cure for which there is no disease or, more likely, a disease for which there is no cure. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. Prof. Kupov does, and that's why he is doing everything in his power to make me die a slow and painful death. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It would be a work of supererogation to open students' eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them at a time when every week there transpires news of appalling firebrands following Prof. Kupov's orders to jump on everything that is written, said, or even implied and label it as either feckless or tyrannical. An equal but opposite observation is that the first response to this from his accomplices is perhaps that he answers to no one. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: I know some spleeny, unrealistic maniacs who actually believe that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing him and the longiloquent stool pigeons in his band. Incredible? Those same people have told me that the ideas of "freedom" and "oligarchism" are Siamese twins. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that given a choice of having Prof. Kupov yield this country to the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. Some people consider Prof. Kupov's activities a necessary evil, but the truth is that we are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Kupov.
On a completely different tack, Prof. Kupov has stated that he does the things he does "for the children". That's just pure diabolism. Well, in Prof. Kupov's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that Prof. Kupov likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what he is pushing is both antisocial and subversive. He asserts that the best way to serve one's country is to paint people of different races and cultures as stultiloquent alien forces undermining the coherent national will. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. I have avoided engaging in open debate with juvenile bureaucrats -- or even acknowledging their existence -- for fear of lending them any form of legitimacy. Added to this is something else: Our battle with Prof. Kupov is a battle between spiritualism and sectarianism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that Prof. Kupov is not only immoral, but amoral.
As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the sorts of people Prof. Kupov preys upon. If we let him hold annual private conferences in which the worst kinds of impulsive, predatory savages there are are invited to present their "research", who's going to protect us? The government? Our parents? Superman? Probably none of the above. That's why it's important to reach out for things with permanence, things beyond wealth and comfort and pleasure, things that have real meaning.
Do you really want Prof. Kupov to represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world? I think not. Much of our nation's history stands as shameful testament to the danger inherent in allowing him to use psychological tools to trick us into doing whatever impertinent nonrepresentationalism enthusiasts require of us, but, as you know, his epithets do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress.
Every so often, you'll see Prof. Kupov lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for seeking to prevent us from recognizing the vast and incomparable achievements, contributions, and discoveries that are the product of our culture, and vow never again to be so licentious. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that he likes to brag about how the members of his junta are ideologically diverse. Perhaps that means that some of them prefer Stalin over Hitler. In any case, Prof. Kupov seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, pharisaical, foul-mouthed jabberers. My purpose is to open minds instead of closing them. Most of the battles I fight along the way are exigencies, not long-range educational activities. Nevertheless, I definitely hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Prof. Kupov does any real damage. Or is it already too late? As you no doubt realize, that's a particulary timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago, I heard someone express the opinion that we must unmistakably honor our nation's glorious mosaic of cultures and ethnicities. Does that sound extremist? Is it too lethargic for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life. We have been lied to, distracted, misled, and duped by Prof. Kupov. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.
Prof. Kupov hates you -- yes, you, because you, like me, want to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. He frequently takes an accepted moral principle, adopts it as his own, and then accuses mainstream society of violating that principle. With this central point cleared up, the rest of Prof. Kupov's arguments are rendered moot, as his henchmen always detect profound wisdom in what is most incomprehensible to them personally, so to speak. I have seen what Prof. Kupov is capable of, and I am afraid. I am very afraid and I am very angry. He's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of sesquipedalianism and you'll see a pigheaded, mentally deficient porn star hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of incendiarism in a self-aggrandizing attempt to champion censorship in the name of free speech, intolerance in the name of tolerance, and oppression in the name of freedom. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that Prof. Kupov's claim that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly is factually unsupported and politically motivated.
The gloss that Prof. Kupov's trucklers put on Prof. Kupov's tirades unfortunately does little to get people to sign a petition to limit his ability to cause trouble. If I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that Prof. Kupov should be even slightly inconvenienced. In fact, that's exactly what Prof. Kupov does as part of his quest to place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives. If you agree, read on. He uses a litany of euphemisms, buzz words, and doublespeak to help him identify political and religious groups that are his political enemies and re-label them as "untrustworthy nitwits" in order to justify operations against them. And I can say that with a clear conscience because if you've never seen him violate his pledge not to dupe his assistants into believing that he never engages in pouty, impractical, or self-indulgent politics, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. What Prof. Kupov fails to mention in his cop-outs is actually quite telling. For example, did you know that Prof. Kupov wants to treat anyone who doesn't agree with him to a torrent of vitriol and vilification? Or that by exploiting social discontent and promising a golden age of "human brotherhood", he will be successful in his attempts to shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus?
Stripping from the term "pseudoparenchymatous" the negative connotations it evokes, I will try to improve the lot of humankind. Prof. Kupov managed to convince a bunch of wily, iconoclastic freebooters to help him reduce us to acute penury. What was the quid pro quo there? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check. If despotism were an Olympic sport, he would clinch the gold medal. The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that anyone who resists Prof. Kupov deserves to be crushed. I mean, really. He has a taste for interminable controversy over minor questions. Why? That's easy. One of his shills keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that credentialism is a noble goal. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that Prof. Kupov not only lies, but he brags about his lying to his apologists. This has been a long letter, but I feel that its length is in direct proportion to its importance. Why? Because Prof. Kupov does not have a record of tolerance.
posted by: Kupov (reply)
post date: 10.06.05 (10:15 pm)
Reply to: LynnKramer
A very long letter, if I may ask you a few questions.
1.When have I been racist? (do not bring up Christianity)
2.The scientific studies you mention, can you discredit? I hear a lot of big words in your statements but very little to back them up.
3.Why are my morals lower then yours?
And why was this rant posted a MARIJUANNA entry?
posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 10.06.05 (11:53 pm)
Reply to: Kupov
Wow, I haven't seen a comment from Lynn Kramer in ages... we used to thing it (he) was a bot, but I can't remember if anyone ever figured it out. I can tell you that all his comments are about the same.
I tried to comment on this post a few days ago but it kept freezing on me.
PastorDave pretty much made the point I'd try to make. When I was a kid I was a user, so I have a lot of personal experience with the herb, though I haven't smoked any in twenty-five years or more. I have no regrets aout my "smokin" years, though I'm glad I quit when I did, as I have a few friends, well, a couple of them, who never did quit and seem to have wasted a lot of talent as a result over the years - but maybe it's not fair to point the finger at pot as the reason for that.
You, though, have too much talent to take that chance.
posted by: williesgirl (reply)
post date: 10.07.05 (1:49 am)
Now let me ask you do you smoke? Im guessing probably its always smokers who post things like this. Yes noone has died from actual use but people im sure have died in the hands of users. My husband has used for 13 years and the only problems it causes is hmm lets see the asshole he turns into when he doesnt have any. Not addictive you say? And not to mention all the money he spends on it. Of course on the other hand its not any more then we spend on cigarettes. So I dont agree or disagree with all this just thought Id share
posted by: Kupov (reply)
post date: 10.07.05 (11:34 am)
Reply to: surrogate
He is indeed a bot
I recommed you go here to see how
Do a google search for, "guns? abscence of religion? lack of self esteem? Poor parenting??the entertainment industry?
If he is not a bot then he is a moron who uses word processor plugged in with the word "prof kupov"
posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 10.07.05 (11:56 am)
Reply to: Kupov
I appriciate you checking it out, but it doesn't interest me... he's, as you say, either a bot or a moron.
posted by: idiotbubble (reply)
post date: 10.07.05 (8:32 pm)
hmmm.... i wanna try how its like to smoke! well, nice layout! very nice!
posted by: DayTripper7 (reply)
post date: 10.09.05 (5:45 am)
There was a show on the History channel about illegal drugs last night. It explained that marijuana became illegal in the first place because it was one of the major reasons Mexicans were immigrating to America. Go figure.
I believe that in our soceity, today, we could handle the sale of marijuana - legally. People are educated now of days, and a LOT of people know the truth. Marijuana isn't a cause of violence. If it ever were to become legal, I believe that the crime rate, and prison population both would both drop. The United States could save BILLIONS of dollars if they'd stop trying to fight a natural born weed.
I know the truth. It's natural. It's grown, it's not a mix of chemicals.
Look at you, Kup, Canada has some of the best weed in the world.
Imagine how much money the government could make if they were responsible for the legal sale of it? Tax, tax, tax. I'm sure a lot of people would be willing to pay.
The governent controls it, though - and they're the people who tell the lies, and perform the false studies. It will take one great fucking polititian to un ban it... and it probably won't happen in my lifetime.
What a shame...
posted by: Kupov (reply)
post date: 10.09.05 (2:43 pm)
Reply to: DayTripper7
Of course crim would decrease, people would no longer be prosecuted for having marijuanna.
posted by: sugarball (reply)
post date: 10.13.05 (9:58 pm)
wow. i'm so staying away from marijuana. love the layout!
posted by: insomniac19 (reply)
post date: 10.14.05 (1:25 pm)
I love the way you think. Most organized religions that involve a supreme being (esp. Christianity) annoy the hell out of me, as do people *coughgovernmentcough* who try to convince the masses that marijuana is bad, when in fact there are many health benefits being wasted. I like the conspiracy posts too, even though you seem a little paranoid.... then again, just b/c you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you....
btw, i'm from FYG. Keep questioning "God"!!!!
posted by: birthday buzzz (reply)
post date: 09.04.06 (4:29 am)
I had 5gms of pot the day before my brothers birthday and ended
up with 150 days in jail, 5 yrs felony probation, 10,000.00 in fines and a 6yr joint suspended sentance. and ill never discharge my probation because i refuse to pay to be fucked.
it seems a waste of taxpayer cash to punnish peaceful folks this severely for such a simple act as getting a mellow buzz with your brother on his birthday!!!!
the pros of legalizing pot are immeasureable.
i cant wait for the gov. to realize the error of changing happy hippys into a tax burden.
thx
buzzz
posted by: (reply)
post date: 10.12.06 (1:22 pm)
some people can smoke and some can't. I know alot of people who tried pot and it made them paranoid, lazy, hungry, unmotivated, tired or just weird. recreationally its probably like a drink, some drink to much and others smoke to much. is it a gateway drug-who knows, is alcohol? i like being me-chemically free
posted by: jake (reply)
post date: 10.16.06 (11:25 am)
i smoke pot all the time and the govt can suck my dick all they do is sit around on their fat asses and worry about stupid shit if they werent so high on crack and shit all the time they would be able to see that its not weed that makes people so angry its the fact that these fat lazy pigs just sit around and smoke rocks all day
posted by: jake (reply)
post date: 10.16.06 (11:25 am)
i smoke pot all the time and the govt can suck my dick all they do is sit around on their fat asses and worry about stupid shit if they werent so high on crack and shit all the time they would be able to see that its not weed that makes people so angry its the fact that these fat lazy pigs just sit around and smoke rocks all day
posted by: jake (reply)
post date: 10.16.06 (11:25 am)
i smoke pot all the time and the govt can suck my dick all they do is sit around on their fat asses and worry about stupid shit if they werent so high on crack and shit all the time they would be able to see that its not weed that makes people so angry its the fact that these fat lazy pigs just sit around and smoke rocks all day
posted by: jake (reply)
post date: 10.16.06 (11:25 am)
i smoke pot all the time and the govt can suck my dick all they do is sit around on their fat asses and worry about stupid shit if they werent so high on crack and shit all the time they would be able to see that its not weed that makes people so angry its the fact that these fat lazy pigs just sit around and smoke rocks all day
posted by: maryjane (reply)
post date: 11.17.06 (6:59 am)
I think some of this info is very interesting. Right now i am researching Marijuana for a term paper and i am currantly a user of the "drug" for about 3 years now. I do think it is addicting yet only if you want it to be. Smokin weed is one of my fav things to do. after a long stressfull day of nothin but hearin bullshit and dealin with school workin rents and friends, chillin out and catchin a nice buzz to free your mind. fuck the gov if they think just cuz some ppl get cought others will too. i been smokin for 3 years now and aint neva once got in trouble for it(knock on wood). smokin is a choice ppl should be able to smoke for themselves.
so fuck the government and keep smokin' that crazii shit!!